Introducing the Pidion HM Rugged Handheld PDA Series

3 06 2013
The new Pidion HM50 and HM40

The new Pidion HM50 and HM40

We’ve sold Pidion for a long time at Rugged and Mobile so we know how they work and when launching new products Pidion rugged handheld PDA’s need a little time to get bedded in and working well so we feel it’s only appropriate now to talk about their new HM40 and Pidion HM50 range.

The Pidion HM40 and HM50 form the 2 newest Rugged handheld PDA arrivals to the Pidion range and you can see as soon as you unbox them that they’re the start of something new, with a different design and better ergonomics.

The new HM40 and HM50 mobile devices in a Nutshell

The HM40 is what we would call a Small Rugged PDA.  It’s characterised as that due to its small 2.8″ screen and focussed on being lightweight, small and can be thought of as a small Blackberry type device with a built in barcode scanner.

The HM50 is also subtly different to anything in the current Pidon line up.  It doesn’t quite have the size and presence of a Pidion BIP-6000, but it’s nowhere near as compact and small as the BIP-5000, so we understand Pidion when they say it fits in between both of these existing devices.

What devices do they make obsolete?

Well the Pidion Hm40 is a completely new device in Pidion’s line up.  It’ll give an option to those wanting something small and will give a great “Value” driven option if you’re looking for an Intermec CS40 or Opticon H21, where it does compete well on price in this category.

The Pidion HM50 on the other hand is going to sit in between the existing BIP-5000 and BIP-6000 devices for the time being.  We’ve been given no end of life notice of either device and like many other devices Pidion sell, I think the HM50 will probably sit right in the middle, giving some subtle but obvious options for some.  Price-wise the HM50 isn’t really that competitive in our view.  So whilst the HM50 brings an up to date spec, for some it’ll be difficult to rationalise with Motorola, Dotel and others having far better value at this kind of spec level and quality.

The old and new - Pidion BIP-6000, HM50, BIP-5000 and HM40 enjoying each others company!

The old and new – Pidion BIP-6000, HM50, BIP-5000 and HM40 enjoying each others company!

Our opinion

We’ll reserve specific device opinions for our first looks and road tests coming up later this week as hardware and spec is only half the story with a rugged PDA.  They’re certainly new, interesting and decent enough devices but since the BIP-6000 and BIP-5000 were launched, the market has become a very different place.  At first glance both the Pidion HM40 and Hm50 bring something new to the Pidion range, they add to the choice for the end user and they also give options in terms of spec and cost.  So within Pidion, I think  both devices make sense.  However when we look at what they’re up against these days we’re not so sure if Pidion are getting it right.  Pidion still offer the same confusing and out of touch comprehensive and warranty services and without that you are at risk, no matter how good your kit is in our view.

Lets test the kit and get back to you!

http://www.ruggedandmobile.com





Why the Motorola MC65 Rugged PDA is the most rugged

20 10 2011
MC55A0 and MC65 (Middle) - Rugged but what makes them special?

MC55A0 and MC65 (Middle) - Rugged but what makes them special when it comes to Ruggedness?

Everyone here believes that the market leaders should get a hard time so that’s why we’re constantly pushing the envelope with lots of different manufacturers, however credit where credit is due we think there are a few highlights to Motorola’s MC65 and MC55A0 that should be mentioned when it comes to ruggedness.

It’s funny how when you talk to Intermec (the UK’s number 2 rugged PDA manufacturer), they won’t even consider the MC65/MC55A0 when you talk about ruggedness to them and most other manufactruers are still talking solely on an IP and Drop spec level.  however Motorola will also tell you that their kit is more rugged than anything in its class too, so who to believe!

The Most Rugged Design in its class, Full Stop

Lets get the boring stuff out of the way first:

  • IP64 = Dust tight and water resistant for most cases.  This is certainly rugged enough when it comes to this class of device.
  • Dropped 1000 times from 1.8M across operating temperature range.  This is the “Drop Test” and it’s up there with the best MIL certified and actually puts a lot of the “dropped 6 times on each face” type tests to shame
  • Tumble tested2000 times.

    Magnesium Frame with rubber mounts

    Magnesium Frame with rubber mounts

MC65 Monocoque case is unique

MC65 Monocoque case is unique

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now the stuff you might not have thought about:

  • Monocoque Unibody Case has less gaps, less stress points and is pretty unique when it comes to something that really helps with protecting the device.  It makes servicing them a pain though!
  • Fully Rugged Connector.  I know connecting cups are expensive and sometimes quirky, but they are also properly rugged for many reasons.  They will not break the device if dropped whilst connected, there are just 5 copper dots on the casing so there’s nothing to fiddle with, stick screwdrivers in to or rust/break and they give a good connection that lasts the life of the device.  USB and Micro USB a definite no-no here as they just snap on the main board.
  • Magnesium Inner frame is rigid and flexes to protect main components from shock, the LCD is mounted on top of a rubber flexi seal and the main board is also mounted on nice little rubber shock absorbing mounts.
  • Space between touchscreen and LCD prevents damage to both components.  OK this isn’t unique by any means but it does mean if you crack a screen, you might only need a new digitizer rather than whole LCD affair.
  • Antimicrobial casing options for harsh Lab/Hospital environments, just finish this model off as something that can also be rugged in some extreme environments.

We normally knock the MC65 and MC55A0′s here simply because we like to see the market leaders lead, but I think when it comes to ruggedness these ever-popular rugged handhelds definitely have some unique points to think about.

http://www.ruggedandmobile.com





Small Rugged PDA Group Test – Features/USPs/Benefits

14 10 2011

So this article is 2nd in our series of 4 Small Rugged PDA group Test blog and today we’re going to just take a look at the overall features, benefits and how the devices feel.  Very “What Car!”

Best Small Rugged PDA's in the hand - Dolphin 6000, CS40, DOTH-300

Best Small Rugged PDA's in the hand - Dolphin 6000, CS40, DOTH-300

In the Hand

Size is important in the Small Rugged PDA class, but it’s also about how these PDA’s feel and work in the hand too and I have to say that every one of these devices felt different when using and holding them.  The Honeywell and Cs40 are the smallest and lightest and felt like most like smartphones, the bump on the Dolphin 6000 isn’t really noticeable but the missing volume and any side keys on the CS40 were.  The chrome on the CS40 looks nice but why make it look nice when the text all over the back of the device makes it look shabby?

We only have a LF RFID version of the GSmart to test with so it has a big bump on the back of it but we know the std version of this is still a deep device and the most bulky device here but it also feels the most rugged and honest too.  It won’t fit into a pocket like the other 4 but you do feel like it’s a real Rugged PDA.

The H21 feels the largest here, despite not physically being the largest and it also had the most awkward keypad in my view although the qwerty keys were easier to type on than the CS40′s.  It misses dedicate scan buttons on the front face though like the others which in devices this size I think are more useful than on the side, where user expect the Windows Mobile dedicated keys like volume, camera and power.

The DOTH-300, despite being the largest on paper was surprisingly slim, slipped into the back pocket of my jeans easily and actually felt smaller than it should have.  It’s getting to get a small but dedicated fan base here I can tell you that!

Simple & Rugged - GSmart Keyboard

Simple & Rugged - GSmart Keyboard

Perceived Ruggedness

Now all of these devices are rugged, have drop specs and IP ratings but I have to say some devices just  feel more rugged than others.  The GSmart is clearly the toughest here, its plastics are rugged, buttons are large, simple and feel they will last a 3 year fight and it really is a Rugged PDA shrunk down.  The DOTH-300 comes in a close 2nd with big buttons again, nicely finished but hard plastics and a recessed screen; It just felt tough too.  The H21 and CS40 come next.  The H21 has a rubbery skin to it which I liked and our demo device seems to be keeping fresh,  The buttons though are poor with our demo device breaing after 3 months use.  The CS40, despite being the most expensive device here clearly uses what I feel are thinner/cheaper plastics.  The Dolphin 6000 is also clearly the least “tough” device here.  It uses shiny cheap plastics, feels the most flimsy (but not flimsy against a smartphone)  but then again its half the price of the CS40.

Price

Intermec’s CS40 tops the bill here, you won’t get much change out of £800 when you’re done.  You do get a choice of keyboard and a fully featured device though with 2D barcode scanner.

The H21 and GSmart come in next at around the £700 mark for very similar specs to the CS40 but you can spec down the 2D scanner for a 1D in both devices and the GSmart can have this removed or replaced with RFID.

Dotel’s DOTH-300 can be specced down to about £500 without the Barcode scanner and you can go a good £150 less than this if in base spec as you can spec out pretty much anything in this device so it really is a great alternative to a semi rugged or smartphone solution now.

The Dolphin 6000, is a clear winner here at £330 but you do have to buy a charge cable on top of that for about £25.

Size

Best described in the image below.  They’re all small compared to a Motorola MC65 which is considered a lightweight fully rugged PDA to us here.

Largest to smallest (MC65 on Right for comparison)

Largest to smallest (MC65 on Right for comparison)

Service

The DOTH-300 and GSmart can be serviced by us here, you won’t get better and faster repair services than us for anything, just ask our customers about that.  The Honeywell has a decent set of service products and despite being the “Cheapest” device here, the little Honeywell has an established and excellent repair and service system to rely upon.  Intermec’s service has been pretty poor recently for us, we’re making changes to make it better but for some reason RMA’s with Intermec are taking 5+ days to even get logged right now.  When the devices eventually get sent, they tend to be handled OK.  THe H21 still does not have a recognised Manufacturer lead service product which I think really hurts the device.

DOTH-300 "PIC" Stylus not to everyones taste

DOTH-300 "PIC" Stylus not to everyones taste

What we rate…

  • 2400mAh (3600 option) Lithium POLYMER batteries as std on DOTH-300.
  • The demo apps on the Dolphin 6000 are awesome, its the easiest device here to get playing with.
  • LF, HF and UHF RFID options on the DOTH-300 & GSmart.
  • Grippy casing of H21.
  • Scanner on CS40 is the best here.
  • Simple RH/LH keyboard layout on GSmart.

 What we hate…

  • Small 1530 mAh battery on Dolphin 6000, we hear that the Honeywell guys are telling people that the device “sips” power and doesn;t need anything bigger but we’ll be the judge of that in our benchmark tests next.
  • Guitar “Pic” stylus on DOTH-300 is not to everyone’s taste, although there is a full stylus available.
  • Buttons on H21.
  • USB and Micro-USB connectors will break on H21, CS40 and GSmart.

Features to note

The Dolphin 6000 is seriously cheap in this class and does this by using an MTK Chinese CPU and main board, along with a cheap 1D scanner but it does work as a package, the scanner is pretty decent and it’s not a slow device to use by any means and is going to rattle this market without doubt because people are looking for cheap that works.

The Doth feels so small in the hand but it’s extra size makes it feel like a small rugged PDA but with all the benefits of a larger one, the 2400mAh std battery os also bang on the money in this class.

Yes you can have any colour on the GSmart as long as its yellow!!  seriously though they will change the colours for larger orders,

The case on the CS40 is just cheap and nasty, chrome on the front, loads of text all over the back…Kind of like putting make-up on a sheep!!

Conclusions so far

Every device here brings something different but I think on balance of the above so far the Honeywell Dolphin 6000 and the Dotel DOTH-300 get the link juice for this blog.  They are showing that you can make a lower priced Small Rugged PDA and by using a bit of initiative keep the quality and featires high.

This will all remain to be seen as we take a look at the performance of each device in our next blog in the series… the benchmarks.

http://www.ruggedandmobile.com





Pidion BM170 cases for £25

22 08 2011
BM170 Cases

BM170 Cases COe in all shapes and sizes

We’ve mentioned the ES400 PDA all week so I wanted to just end this series on cases by looking at what the main Motorla ES400 alternative can offer too.

The Motorola ES400 benefots from numbers and the way it’s marketed so people like Otterbox have a brand and demand reason to supply a case, however the BM170 isn’t that far behind but in the absence of an Otterbox what else is there?  In this article we look at what just £25 will buy you for the Pidion BM170 semi-rugged PDA.

On the Flip-side

Firstly we also provide  exact same case designs for the BM170 flips styles as we do for any other Rugged PDA in the Pidion or Motorola range that matter.  There’s the same leather and Synthetic flip cases available, they’re re-designable and they’re still just £25.

Holsters

We provide 2 holsters for the BM170, both even less expensive and one is even completely budget at £15 and £12 respectively. If you need something cheap, simple but cheerful, then look no further than here.

Is that an Otterbox you’re wearing…

Or just a silicon case?  There is a  great silicone case for the BM170 too which is designed to fit either the standard or extended battery versions.  It’s thick, solid and in our view here gives as good protection as an otterbox does and it has handstrap which can be removed or a belt strap attached instead.  Agina these retail at just over £25 each.

Right, we’re done on cases for a while now, just remener a few good rules to go by with cases are:

  • No case makes a durable, semi-rugged PDA or smartphone rugged.  if you need rugged then buy rugged.
  • Despite the above, a good case will help keep any PDA in tip top condition, not only helping with its life but also its resale value when you come to change your mobile hardware.
  • A Good PDA case also has lots of hidden advantages like aiding usability and giving your workers more ways to attach devices so they don;t fall in the first place.
  • Most cases are bespoke and can be tweaked or even redesigned to carry your brand or a design that fits perfectly with your needs.

Come talk to us any time here at RAM and we’ll be happy to help.

http://www.ruggedandmobile.com





Motorola ES400 Otterbox Vs Flip Case

18 08 2011
Motorola ES400 Cases

Motorola ES400 Cases (Flipn on left, Otterbox right)

We’ve used Otterboxes here for years on our work iphones and HTC smartphones and for those of you that don’t know, the Otterbox is a plastic case that typically comes in 3 forms for each smartphone one is designed for.  The idea is that the case snaps on top of the PDA forming a permanent shell around the phone and the theory is that the case makes the phone more Rugged.  In fact there is a nice new “Rugged” icon on the newer Otterbox boxes and as you know, anything that states its rugged here gets the once over by us!

To be clear on Ruggedness!

No case, with a couple of exceptions, make any PDA, whether semi-rugged PDA or smartphone “rugged.”  Please remember that IP ratings for dust and water are not improved at all and no case on the market has a MIL drop spec as you really have to design the PDA from the bottom up to attain this properly.  We can’t stress this enough as we see semi-rugged PDA’s like the Motorola ES400 confusing customers every day where they think its fully rugged with or without a case on it!  Having said that “Durability” is also about what you can do as a user to pro-actively protect your PDA and a good case can help with the life and condition of your little semi rugged PDA significantly.

We’ll take a look at the most popular case we sell for the ES400 and compare it to the new Otterbox to see if it lives up to its name!

Design & Features

Versatility

As you can see from the photo’s the leather flip case of the ES400 is designed to be versatile and add to the functionality of the device.  It can worn in various ways with an optional clip and rings for attaching extra straps or handles and it has stylus and pen holders.  In fact we can also bespoke these cases for you with logos, or add or change the design for your specific use.

The Otterbox takes a different approach and attempts to make the semi-rugged ES400 more durable without affecting the form factor other than obviously increasing the bulk slightly.  It does come with a plastic hard case holder with a clip so it can be attached to the belt.

Features

The Otterbox comes with a plastic keyboard cover designed to give your keyboard a bit of water protection but it makes the keyboard, which is already hard to use, unusable in my view.  We already got feedback from one customer that its ridiculous to even think you can use the device with this fixed to it.  You don’t have to fit it but it does make the case slightly loose on the device if not, nothing a bit of tissue paper can;t sort!

Motorola ES400 Otterbox and flip - side on

Motorola ES400 Otterbox and flip - side on

Holders/Clips

The Otterbox comes with the same standard plastic holder with built-in clip as you get with all Otterboxes.  it’s designed the clip the ES400 face in so you have to take the device out of the holder before using it.  Annoyingly the rubber silicone skin just kept coming off every time we took the device out of the holder.  You can;t use it screen out like other cases, the clip just forces the rubber too much activates the mode button on the ES400.

The Leather case comes with a clip for belt use or can be specified with a belt strap or nothing.  The holder is the case in this instance.

Extended battery capability

A big winner for the flip case is that it uses expandable sides so that you can accomodate either the std or extended battery versions of the ES400 in the same case.  You can change your device without changing your case.  The Otterbox does accomodate both versions of the ES400 but with 2 distinct cases.  We Asked if you could buy the case back and silicone separately and the answer was no.

Motorola ES400 Otterbox - In The Box

Motorola ES400 Otterbox - In The Box

Protection

The Flip case also has the flip cover so with most issues from drops coming for cracked screens and damaged keys, it’s arguably going to give more protection.  The Otterbox has a recessed screen We fitted one of our impact screens to it and this would help with knocks.

The flip case does have gaps in its casing though so drop the ES400 on its corner and its going to scratch or crack more easily. 

It’s very hard to say here which one will offer better protection and it will depend on your users and scenario.  I feel the flip case would help more users from experience.

Build quality

As an avid user of Otterboxes for years I am going to say this….They have got worse in quality and design in my view over the years.  They have also come down in price too but the cases used to use better plastics, it is a bit creaky and squeaky on the ES400 and the worst issue is the way the rubber case attaches to the device.  It keeps falling away meaning you literally have to squeeze the case back into its rim every time you take it out of your pocket.  I know, I have spent the last 12 months having to do this every time I use my iPhone!!  The ES400 case is no different and as i’m writing this the case actually popped out of the rim just sitting on the desk next to me!!

The flip case is well made and it will last for years if looked after well.  It’s never going to be as solid as a piece of plastic and silicone but on our abrasion tests it actually came out the winner.  The silicon wore better at low friction but the leather outlasted it to destruction.  Probably why motorbikers still wear leather or synthetic suits and not silicone ones!!

ES400 Otterbox Silicone Case

Poor fitting ES400 Otterbox Silicone Skin

Cradle test

You can’t can’t cradle either device easily in the manufacturer vehicle cradles, but the flip case can be opened at the bottom to allow for the device to be desktop cradled more easily.  It’s not ideal though.  The Otterbox case is difficult to remove and not designed for removal so you’re stuck using direct cables for charging and syncing.

Device condition test

We can’t test the life of the ES400 in the Otterbox because it’s a new product but we have used Otterboxes on our work iphones and HTC’s for years and years.  I have an image of one of our iphone 3G’s (now development) phones which was actually my phone for 14 months and as you can see it’s pristine.  I can;t say the same for our iPhone 4G’s though as they use a different case design which is clearly not as good quality as the older yellow and black cases.  They don;t fit quite so well so they have scratched the phone slightly and the rubber split within 6 months.  The ES400 case looks chunkier in design so we would expect this to wear better.

We put the leather flip cases onto our loan kit and they actually also keep the ES400 looking shiny and new.  The corners of the device have seen some scratching but that’s it.  So both cases score level on this part.

Ease of Use

Like I said above this could easily be down to what you are doing, so a shoulder strapped flip case could be the winner for some.  However taking the cases on face value, the flip is clearly a bit more awkward to use, whereas the Otterbox is ready 100% of the time, other than having to put that silicone skin back into its rim!  On newer leather flip cases the flip sometimes needs some coercing to stay back whilst in use.

Verdict

It’s really a case of what you need out of your solution.  If you want to keep your device clean and nice and want to keep the form factor without adding bulk or fuss then the Otterbox wins.  If you want to bespoke a design or have nicer options for carrying and using the case then the flip is the clear winner.

As far as ruggedness goes, in our opinion, there’s nothing in it with both offering good and bad points.  I would be interested to see how the synthetic version of the flip fares though as this is lighter and more durable.

The Otterbox has serious design flaws though in my opinion and the silicone skin will drive you crazy as it pops out all the time and loosens over time.  The flip case will wear better and last longer in our opinion.

Price-wise there’s nothing in it, both case should be about £25-30 depending on the retailer. 

http://www.ruggedandmobile.com








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 749 other followers